Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
A Debate On Federal Funding Of The Arts: Pro - Term Papers

A Debate On Federal Funding Of The Arts: Pro

The Honorable Claudine Schneider, a Republican, United States Representative from Rhode Island, argues in favor of the National Endowment for the Arts(NEA) program. The NEA is controversial because of the artists it chooses to fund. While others feel that it needs to end, Schneider states how it has helped society. Some want the NEA to stop because they believe that some of the art is too graphic and that the taxpayers money, which helps fund the NEA, should go to other things like welfare or the deficit. Schneider argues that art is a form of speech which is protected by the First Amendment.
Schneider is writing to continue the funding of the NEA. She mainly stresses that Art ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

proves her point very accurately. She defines the terms clearly and doesn’t present her argument in a confusing manner. Schneider is fair in that she supports the NEA in a calm manner and doesn’t attack the opposing side.
I strongly agree with Schneider on the controversy over the NEA. I believe that art is an important part of society and that it reflects society. Some may think the art is vulgar or graphic, but that is how society is. Society is harsh and changes all the time like art. Society can also be vulgar and graphic by the way that people talk or act. I agree with Schneider that art is a form of speech and that it can’t be taken away. Schneider impressed me by providing numbers in her presentation.
I view Schneider’s overall presentation as valid and believable because of all the examples she provided. For instance, the 68 cents from the taxpayer and the increases in Orchestras and music or dance companies. I believe this is a strong argument because it ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

A Debate On Federal Funding Of The Arts: Pro. (2005, December 22). Retrieved January 22, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/A-Debate-Federal-Funding-Arts-Pro/38436

"A Debate On Federal Funding Of The Arts: Pro." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 22 Dec. 2005. Web. 22 Jan. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/A-Debate-Federal-Funding-Arts-Pro/38436>

"A Debate On Federal Funding Of The Arts: Pro." Essayworld.com. December 22, 2005. Accessed January 22, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/A-Debate-Federal-Funding-Arts-Pro/38436.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 12/22/2005 10:12:14 PM
Category: Government
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 424
Pages: 2

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier