Analysis of Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett
Day of Deceit
The purpose of this paper is to introduce, discuss, and analyze the book "Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor" by Robert B. Stinnett. Specifically, it will give a summary of the book, including the main and secondary theses of the book. Stinnett's book "Day of Deceit" is a controversial look at the events leading up to the attack on Pearl Harbor. More than a history book, this is a book that points fingers and makes a variety of allegations regarding our government and its' duplicity and deceit of the American public. To read this book is to question what we believe is the truth, and just how we come to our decisions about current and historic ...
Want to read the rest of this paper? Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers
|
a method to incite the American people into joining World War II. This is the main theme woven between the pages of the book. However, there are secondary theses too, including the proposition that America broke the Japanese naval code and knew the Japanese carriers were on their way to launch an attack on Pearl Harbor, and that many documents relating to the attack, including code breaking documents, have never been released to the public. The author's thesis contends these documents prove that FDR knew about the impending attack and did nothing. Another secondary thesis begins with the documents that back up his contentions themselves. Throughout the book, the author uses evidence from his extensive research to back up his thesis that the United States knew of the impending attack. Even more difficult to comprehend is the underlying thesis for this argument, that FDR desperately wanted to enter the war in Europe, but needed public opinion behind his decisions, and so, he ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays. Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
access to Japanese diplomatic communications. He notes, "...at the time when it was needed most, the report of these J-code intercepts was withheld from both the US Pacific Fleet and the US Army commander on Oahu (Stinnett 99). In addition, he exonerates Admiral Husband Kimmel in several places in the book, noting Admiral Kimmel had an idea the Japanese would attack, but was stymied at every turn by his superiors and the White House. Stinnett writes, "The admiral tried on a number of occasions to do something to defend Pearl Harbor, based on Rochefort's troubling intercepts. Exactly two weeks prior to the attack, Kimmel ordered a search for a Japanese carrier force North of Hawaii" ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library. Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports, and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Analysis of Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett. (2016, August 22). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Analysis-of-Day-Deceit-Robert-Stinnett/105829
"Analysis of Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 22 Aug. 2016. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Analysis-of-Day-Deceit-Robert-Stinnett/105829>
"Analysis of Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett." Essayworld.com. August 22, 2016. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Analysis-of-Day-Deceit-Robert-Stinnett/105829.
"Analysis of Day of Deceit by Robert Stinnett." Essayworld.com. August 22, 2016. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Analysis-of-Day-Deceit-Robert-Stinnett/105829.
|