Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Constitutional Law Marbury V M - School Essays

Constitutional Law Marbury V M

Marbury v. Madison, one of the first Supreme Court cases asserting the power of judicial review, is an effective argument for this power; however, it lacks direct textual basis for the decision. Marshall managed to get away with this deficiency because of the silence on many issues and the vague wording of the Constitution. During the early testing period when few precedents existed, there was much debate about fundamental issues concerning what was intended by the words of the Constitution and which part of government should have the final word in defining the meaning of these words. Marshall used the Marbury case to establish the Supreme Court's place as the final judge.
Marshall ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

such an appointment was within the scope of the president's powers. Debate arises because the Constitution is silent on the exact time at which the appointment is considered complete. The Supreme Court ruled that "when a commission has been signed by the president, the appointment is made; and that the commission is complete, when the seal of the United States has been affixed to it by the [secretary of state]." This ruling does not have direct constitutional support, but it is not an unreasonable decision.
The second question which Marshall addressed was, "If [Marbury] has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of this country afford him a remedy?" The answer is logically yes although there are no specific words in the Constitution to support such an answer. Based on the type of government intended by the Constitution, the government is expected to protect individual liberty. As Marshall says, "[The government] will certainly cease to deserve [to be termed a ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Constitutional Law Marbury V M. (2005, March 24). Retrieved January 22, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Constitutional-Law-Marbury-V-M/24225

"Constitutional Law Marbury V M." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 24 Mar. 2005. Web. 22 Jan. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Constitutional-Law-Marbury-V-M/24225>

"Constitutional Law Marbury V M." Essayworld.com. March 24, 2005. Accessed January 22, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Constitutional-Law-Marbury-V-M/24225.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 3/24/2005 06:35:01 PM
Category: Political Science
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 1136
Pages: 5

Save |