Group Polarization And Competi
On Tuesday, November 14, 1995, in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the federal government shut down all "non-essential" services due to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national "chicken" between the House Speaker and the President. And, at an estimated cost of 200 million dollars a day, this dubious battle of dueling egos did not come cheap (Bradsher, 1995, p.16). Why do politicians find it almost congenitally impossible to cooperate? What is it about politics and power that seem to always put them at odds with good government? Indeed, is an effective, well run government even possible given the current adversarial relationship between our two main ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: Group behavior with an emphasis on polarization, and competition. However, one should keep in mind that these two factors are interrelated. Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group competition by driving any two groups who initially disagree farther apart in their respective views. In turn, a competitive situation in which one side must lose in order for the other to win (and political situations are nearly always competitive), will codify the differences between groups - leading to further extremism by those seeking power within the group - and thus, to further group polarization. In the above example, the two main combatants, Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich, were virtually forced to take uncompromising, disparate views because of the very nature of authority within their respective political groups. Group polarization refers to the tendency of groups to gravitate to the ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
and cooperation are impossible (p. 136). This is especially so if the opponents are dedicated to retaining power "at all costs." That power is an end in itself is made clear by the recent shutdown of the government. It served no logical purpose. Beyond costing a lot of money, it had no discernible effect except as a power struggle between two political heavyweights. According to David Kipnis (1976, cited in Baron & Graziano, 1991), one of the negative effects of power is, in fact, the tendency to regard it as its own end, and to ignore the possibility of disastrous results from the reckless use of power (p. 433). Therefore, it would seem that (at least in this case) government policy ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Group Polarization And Competi. (2008, August 19). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Group-Polarization-And-Competi/88554
"Group Polarization And Competi." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 19 Aug. 2008. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Group-Polarization-And-Competi/88554>
"Group Polarization And Competi." Essayworld.com. August 19, 2008. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Group-Polarization-And-Competi/88554.
"Group Polarization And Competi." Essayworld.com. August 19, 2008. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Group-Polarization-And-Competi/88554.
|
Save
Report