Hear No Evil: Music Censorship

The debate over censorship in music has gone on for centuries. From the Catholic Church’s disapproval of Gaetano Donizetti’s 19th century opera (Oliver 40) to the refusal to show Elvis’s gyrating hips on television in the 1950’s (Nuzum 12), the problem has always loomed in the background of society. The modern censorship has become a debate over the effects that obscene or overly violent music has on children. Church groups and Family organizations argue that musical forms directly influence children in a negative way, while musicians and free speech advocates scream First Amendment rights. The debate over censorship has transcended religious and political contexts, plopping itself ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

debates over censorship in music was the Parent Music Resource Center (PMRC) Congressional hearings on September 19, 1985. The PMRC is a Washington women’s group that informs parents about violent or obscene music. The group was founded in 1985 by Tipper Gore, along with three other women (Stolder 30). Mrs. Gore left the PMRC in 1993 (Gowen 20) and Barbara Wyatt currently holds the office of PMRC president (Stolder 30). The PMRC was the group responsible for the introduction of the record industry’s “Parental Advisory” stickers in 1990. These stickers are placed upon all albums that are deemed obscene or violent. The PMRC is a powerful group, with a lot of backing in Washington, but they face some tough opposition in the hearings.
The opposition to the PMRC was a group of record industry representatives and musicians. They are not a formal group. Their belief that music censorship opposes the artists right to free speech brings them together and gives them the strength ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

caused a rash of pro-censorship bills to be introduced. Through out their comments to congress, the PMRC uses all the appeals to convince their audience, but most of their appeal stems from the use of pathos.
Tipper Gore uses many references to young children in her speech. Anything that pertains to children appeals to our emotions because children are seen as some what helpless and they need our protection. She states, “...young people who are forming their characters and developing their value systems...” (PMRC Congressional Hearings 48). In doing so, Mrs. Gore gives her audience a sense of guilt for the possible damage that they could be causing children by not regulating music. No ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


Hear No Evil: Music Censorship. (2006, October 7). Retrieved March 28, 2020, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hear-No-Evil-Music-Censorship/53535
"Hear No Evil: Music Censorship." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 7 Oct. 2006. Web. 28 Mar. 2020. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hear-No-Evil-Music-Censorship/53535>
"Hear No Evil: Music Censorship." Essayworld.com. October 7, 2006. Accessed March 28, 2020. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hear-No-Evil-Music-Censorship/53535.
"Hear No Evil: Music Censorship." Essayworld.com. October 7, 2006. Accessed March 28, 2020. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hear-No-Evil-Music-Censorship/53535.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 10/7/2006 03:49:11 PM
Category: Music & Musicians
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 2708
Pages: 10

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

» Music Censorship
» Catcher In The Rye 7
» Diamonds Are My Best Friend
» Plagues And Epidemics
» The Capitalist Future: A Conseq...
» Violence as Seen in Shyam Selva...
» Censorship Of American Music
» Music Censorship
» Banned And Censored Music
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 Essayworld. All rights reserved