Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau
Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of many new governments. These philosophers all recognize that people develop a social contract within their society, but have differing views on what exactly the social contract is and how it is established. Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau each developed differing versions of ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
of nature. They did not believe government should be organized through the Church, therefore abandoning the idea of the divine right theory, where power of the King came directly from G-d. Starting from a clean slate, with no organized church, they needed a construct on what to build society on. The foundation of society began with the original state of nature. Hobbes’s perception of the original state of nature is what would exist if there were no common power to execute and enforce the laws to restrain individuals. In this case, the laws of the jungle would prevail where only the fittest survive. Man’s desires are insatiable. Since resources are scarce, humankind is naturally competitive, inevitably creating jealousy and hatred, which eventually leads to war. This constant state of war is what Hobbes’ believes to be man’s original state of nature. According to Hobbes, man cannot be trusted in the state of nature. Limits must be put on freedom and inalienable rights. Hobbes lived ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
perfect state for man, where he is free. In the original state, man lives alone in innocence where he is virtuous. Rousseau does not agree that man is an aggressive and greedy being in the original state of nature as Hobbes suggests. He argues that men are truly happy in the state of nature. Only when men become sociable, they become wicked.
In Rousseau’s Social Contract, man is depicted as a “stupid and unimaginative animal.” Man has no reason or conscience when in contact with others. Possessions begin to be claimed, but the inequality of skill lead to inequality of fortunes. Just the idea of claiming possessions excites men’s passions, which provoke conflict, leading to war. Rousseau ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. (2007, February 24). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau/60855
"Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 24 Feb. 2007. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau/60855>
"Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau." Essayworld.com. February 24, 2007. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau/60855.
"Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau." Essayworld.com. February 24, 2007. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Hobbes-Locke-Rousseau/60855.
|
Save
Report