Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Olmstead V. United States (1928) - Online Term Papers

Olmstead V. United States (1928)


Olmstead v. United States (1928)
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Taft
Vote: 5-4
Case reached Supreme Court by writ of certiorari.

Facts:

The evidence in the records discloses a conspiracy of amazing magnitude
to import, possess, and sell liquor unlawfully. Involved were not less than
fifty employees, two sea-going vessels for transportation of the goods to
British Columbia, a ranch beyond the city limits of Seattle with a large
underground cache to store the liquor, and many other caches around the area of
Seattle, a maintained city office with executives, secretaries, salesmen,
deliverymen, dispatchers, bookkeepers, collectors, scouts, and an attorney.
Olmstead was the leading ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

places
along the Puget Sound and from there was transported to the various caches.
The information leading to the arrests was made primarily by four
Federal prohibition officers. The officers placed small wires along the main
lines outside the homes of the four main conspirators and that of the office.
No intrusion was made into private property. Olmstead was found to have made
dealings with members of the Seattle police to secure the release of any of the
conspiring parties that might get arrested.

Procedural History:

Petitioners were convicted in the District Court of the Western District
of Washington for conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act. The
conviction was upheld upon appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The
case was granted writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court.

Legal Issue:

Whether the use as evidence of private telephone conversations between
the defendants and others, intercepted by means of wiretapping, amounted to a
violation of ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.


Already a member? Login


CITE THIS PAGE:

Olmstead V. United States (1928). (2006, December 28). Retrieved April 27, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Olmstead-V-United-States-1928/57813
"Olmstead V. United States (1928)." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 28 Dec. 2006. Web. 27 Apr. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Olmstead-V-United-States-1928/57813>
"Olmstead V. United States (1928)." Essayworld.com. December 28, 2006. Accessed April 27, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Olmstead-V-United-States-1928/57813.
"Olmstead V. United States (1928)." Essayworld.com. December 28, 2006. Accessed April 27, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Olmstead-V-United-States-1928/57813.
JOIN NOW
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays


PAPER DETAILS
Added: 12/28/2006 12:13:00 PM
Category: Government
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 752
Pages: 3

Save | Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS
Save and find your favorite essays easier

SIMILAR ESSAYS
» Only The Heart
» Watership Down 2
» Chinese Communist Influences
» Hidden Politics
» Stereotypes - Definitional Essa...
» My Library
» Essay About Criticism Of Shakes...
» The Romantically Impaired Pruf
» The Word "Wild"
» Psychology
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2024 Essayworld. All rights reserved