Plato's Republic
Critics of The Republic, Plato's contribution to the history of
political theory, have formed two distinct opinions on the reasoning behind the
work. The first group believes that The Republic is truly a model for a
political society, while the other strongly objects to that, stating it as
being far too fantastic for any society to operate successfully by these
suggested methods. In an exchange between Crito and Dionysius, this argument is
first introduced, with Crito siding with those who agree that The Republic is a
realistic political model, and Dionysius arguing on behalf of those who doubt it
as being realistic, claiming it to be a criticism of politics in general.
Both sides ...
Want to read the rest of this paper? Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers
|
of his time, and critics who
sided with Crito believed that The Republic was Plato's way of introducing a
political system in which he would feel comfortable supporting (Plato 204).
Conversely though, The Republic itself is summed up this way:
Well, one would be enough to effect all this reform that now seems so
incredible, if he had subjects disposed to obey; for it is surely
not impossible that they should consent to carry out our laws and
customs when laid down by a ruler. It would be no miracle if others
should think as we do; and we have, I believe, sufficiently shown that our
plan, if practicable, is the best. So, to conclude: our institutions
would be the best, if they could be realized, and to realize them, though
hard, is not impossible (Plato 210-211).
These institutions of which Plato speaks are described in the body of
The Republic, and not only does Plato explain how they are carried out in
current society, but he ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays. Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
and thirdly, that this reluctance is
reasonable, because the life of injustice is much the better
life of the two--so people say. That is not what I think myself,
Socrates; only I am bewildered by all that Thrasymachus and ever
so many others have dinned into my ears; and I have never yet
heard the case for justice stated as I wish to hear it (Plato 43).
Throughout this chapter, Plato makes a point to say how difficult it is to
do what is right, since it seems so much easier to take the easy way out, to do
the wrong (Plato 49). And in summing up this chapter, Plato had one final
contribution, “You must not be content with proving that justice is superior ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library. Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports, and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Plato's Republic. (2004, December 11). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Platos-Republic/18825
"Plato's Republic." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 11 Dec. 2004. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Platos-Republic/18825>
"Plato's Republic." Essayworld.com. December 11, 2004. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Platos-Republic/18825.
"Plato's Republic." Essayworld.com. December 11, 2004. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Platos-Republic/18825.
|