Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
The Sexual Politics of Meat Analysis - Online Term Paper

The Sexual Politics of Meat Analysis

With "The Sexual Politics of Meat," Carol J. Adams takes us a step beyond hippie admonishments against meat eating and examines the symbolic connotations of animal consumption. Meat is metaphor, meat consumption a political choice representing dominance, violation, and violence. Patriarchy affirms the slaughter of animals as an exclusively male domain: men are the hunters, women the gatherers. Men, deemed more worthy and needy of animal protein, consume more meat than their female counterparts in a given society. Throughout time and culture, "people with power have always eaten meat." People in power, of course, are men.
Meat connotes masculinity. The glory of a good hunt is male power ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

and honey. Male giants eat human flesh; cannibalism is another level of mammal consumption. The Bible instructs priests to be in charge of the meat; women are not permitted to touch or taste. Modern cookbooks segregate the barbeque sections for their male readers, because grilling meat is the male domain. Women shall content themselves with side dishes and "lighter" fare. Meat also denotes deeper social taboos: meat is partially or entirely forbidden for female consumption. Therefore, meat is elevated to a place of prestige. Patterns of food distribution reflect patterns of sexual power distribution. Meat demands respect; women do not.
The connection between meat and masculinity is in large part a passive-aggressive one, subtly contributing to subjugation. Men become "belligerent" over meat and look with disdain on meals prepared without meat. Such meals are relegated to women, the weaker sex. The connection between meat and violence can be more overt or direct: a lack of meat ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

The Sexual Politics of Meat Analysis. (2015, July 25). Retrieved January 22, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/The-Sexual-Politics-of-Meat-Analysis/104825

"The Sexual Politics of Meat Analysis." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 25 Jul. 2015. Web. 22 Jan. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/The-Sexual-Politics-of-Meat-Analysis/104825>

"The Sexual Politics of Meat Analysis." Essayworld.com. July 25, 2015. Accessed January 22, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/The-Sexual-Politics-of-Meat-Analysis/104825.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 7/25/2015 04:17:09 AM
Category: English
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 957
Pages: 4

Save |