Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
An Analysis Of The Philosophy Of Science - Term Papers

An Analysis Of The Philosophy Of Science

In my analysis of the philosophy of science, I will attempt to give an analysis of Aristotle’s demonstration and scientific knowledge starting points and how they apply to his theory, his definition in sciences, and scientific enquires of the various questions posted as well as his ideals of explanation, which gives clear ideal of his theory points in his premises.
Aristotle starting points of sciences are definitions, existence proposition and general logical truth, which can only be grasped and not demonstrated. They are not verbal but give inner or essential nature of natural kinds, pertaining to the science. From these stating points one may deduce valid syllogisms with further ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

knowledge of the causes. This is not possible, because having scientific knowledge is being in this condition, and those who think they have this knowledge are not, but those who do really are. Which follows that anything of scientific knowledge cannot be otherwise. Nous (starting -points which are themselves knowable) grasps indemontratible starting points. Therefore, if scientific knowledge is what we say it is then demonstrative knowledge depends on premises of truth, which are primitive and immediate. The conclusion must give the true reasons of facts mentioned. Aristotle example of this is the nearness of the planets and why they do not twinkle. He argues that the starting points of demonstration are necessary because they are truth and demonstration knowledge comes from necessary starting points.
Deductive starting points cannot be proven and do not have to be grasped – these are called posits. A posit assumes that something is or something is not, a supposition; ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

An Analysis Of The Philosophy Of Science. (2006, June 22). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/An-Analysis-Of-The-Philosophy-Science/47943

"An Analysis Of The Philosophy Of Science." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 22 Jun. 2006. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/An-Analysis-Of-The-Philosophy-Science/47943>

"An Analysis Of The Philosophy Of Science." Essayworld.com. June 22, 2006. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/An-Analysis-Of-The-Philosophy-Science/47943.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 6/22/2006 01:58:32 AM
Category: English
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 648
Pages: 3

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier