Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Law - College Papers

Law

Concerning Wilburn's case, he undeniably had a contract with Jimmy's shop, which was completed by choosing his desirable product and then paying for it, the price for which is $2000. According to the advertising email by Jimmy, a free delivery service was available for any purchase of goods worth more than $500. Thus meaning that Wilburn, with his $2000 purchase, was provided with the choice of using the delivery service provided by Jimmy's shop since his purchase was well over $500. Wilburn did not take advantage of the service (or rather did not know about it), and decided to complain. The problem now is does Wilburn's complaint stand?

Considering the case of R. v. Clarke (1927) 40 ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

stated that the consent of the terms of an offer was vital, without a consent there would be no contract. Therefore if the offeror and the offeree did not agree on the same terms of contract, it would be equivalent to not having a contract at all.

The same applies to our case concerning the contract between Wilburn and Jimmy. Wilburn made a contract with Jimmy's shop only concerning the purchase of the DVD player, not of the delivery service, i.e. Wilburn made an acceptance of the contract while being completely ignorant of the free delivery service, he was only aware of the service in retrospect, after purchasing the DVD player. Given such a fact it was safe to say that Jimmy would not be bound by the terms of delivery since Wilburn was not aware of it and did not demand for it during his purchase. Wilburn's complaint is not valid according to contract law.

Susan

According to the present case, Susan made a promise to Kitty, or rather the beauty salon, that if she won the ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Law. (2011, April 8). Retrieved April 26, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Law/97814

"Law." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 8 Apr. 2011. Web. 26 Apr. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Law/97814>

"Law." Essayworld.com. April 8, 2011. Accessed April 26, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Law/97814.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 4/8/2011 10:21:52 AM
Submitted By: itcl224
Category: Legal Issues
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 948
Pages: 4

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier