Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Sauv� v. Canada: You Be The Judge - Papers Online

Sauv� v. Canada: You Be The Judge

Sauv� v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)

The case of Sauv� vs. Canada, a man named Richard Sauv� was serving a life sentence for first-degree murder. He challenged the Canada Elections Act, arguing that its ban on voting to all inmates serving sentences violated sections three and fifteen of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The two Charter violations being addressed here are Democratic Rights, but most importantly Equality Rights. I feel that it violates his democratic rights because the right to vote is fundamental to a democratic society. I also feel that it violates his equality rights. I do acknowledge the fact that he is a prisoner. However, he is peacefully paying ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

I partially agree with the government�s right to put a limit on this Charter right. The amendment disqualifies only those prisoners who have committed serious crimes, not those who are serving time for summary offences. Furthermore, the prisoners who have lengthy sentences that are not of �life� status (life in prison) will have their voting rights restored to them upon release, so I do not find it unreasonable in this sense to temporarily disable their right to vote while they are serving their sentences.
However, I disagree with the Reasonable Limits Clause for those who are serving life sentences for indictable offences. These inmates will never be allowed outside of prison that is why this clause conflicts with their rights in an unjustifiable manner. There are always alternatives that can accommodate those with life sentences to vote. One of these alternatives could be those with no track record of violence or trouble with administration during their incarceration should be ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Sauv� v. Canada: You Be The Judge. (2014, March 31). Retrieved March 26, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Sauv-v-Canada-You-Be-Judge/103879

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 3/31/2014 09:39:08 PM
Submitted By: anthonyjarvis_
Category: Political Science
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 487
Pages: 2

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier