Skeptical Views On Noahs Ark

Skeptical view of the flood myth
As skeptics have long been aware, there was no global flood in the last 5000 years, a boatload of animals did not ground on so-called Mount Ararat or on any mountain, and the world's animals are not descended from two or seven pairs of each species that lived during the third millennium BC. Nor is there any archaeological proof that a man survived a flood by being on a boat loaded with animals, food, and drinking water.
The Noah's Ark book summarized here does not claim historicity for Noah or the ark story, but the book does claim that some of the story elements in the Ancient Near East flood were based on an actual river flood. This archaeologically ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

king Ziusudra which includes several story elements very similar to the Genesis flood myth. Shuruppak was also the flood hero's city according to the Epic of Gilgamesh. The flood myth in the Epic of Gilgamesh was adapted from an earlier myth, the Epic of Atrahasis which is also very similar to the Genesis flood myth. Six of these Ancient Near East flood myths contain numerous distinctive story elements that are very similar to the Genesis flood myth and indicate a literary affinity or dependency on a common body of myths about the flood hero Ziusudra and based on the Euphrates River flood of 2900 BC.
Parts of the original myths were physically possible, but other parts were not possible. The possible parts can be treated as an ancient legend to which mythical material was added later. However, without contemporary artifacts, it is not possible to prove how much of the original legend was true and how much was fiction based on a real flood. In the Noah's Ark book, the original ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

that was already loaded with cargo being transported to market. The runaway barge floated down the Euphrates River into the Persian Gulf and grounded in an estuary at the mouth of the river. After moving to dry land, Ziusudra offered a sacrifice to a Sumerian god on an alter at the top of a temple ziggurat, an artificial hill. Later, story tellers mistranslated the ambiguous word for hill as mountain. The story tellers then erroneously assumed that the nearby barge must have grounded on top of a mountain. Additional details in the reconstructed legend about Ziusudra (Noah) can be found in the Noah's Ark book.
home page
Tour of subjects
For Old Testament scholars
The Noah's Ark book ...

Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.


Skeptical Views On Noahs Ark. (2007, December 24). Retrieved July 15, 2020, from
"Skeptical Views On Noahs Ark.", 24 Dec. 2007. Web. 15 Jul. 2020. <>
"Skeptical Views On Noahs Ark." December 24, 2007. Accessed July 15, 2020.
"Skeptical Views On Noahs Ark." December 24, 2007. Accessed July 15, 2020.
Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

Added: 12/24/2007 12:05:00 AM
Category: Miscellaneous
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 6339
Pages: 24

Save | Report


Save and find your favorite essays easier

» Two Views On The Confederate Fl...
» Society's Views On Family Value...
» Views on Unemployment
» Martin Luther King and Gerry Sp...
» Oedipus the King and Aristotle'...
» Hume
» The Influence, And Views Of Net...
» Essay On Kierkegaard
» Philosophy - Hume
» Noah’s Arc, The Rip-Off
Copyright | Cancel | Contact Us

Copyright © 2020 Essayworld. All rights reserved