Business And Ethics
UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE
VAFB, CALIFORNIA
ECBU 346
BUSINESS COMMUNICATION
FEBURARY 12, 1997
From a business perspective, working under government contracts can be
very lucrative. In general, a steady stream of orders keep coming in, revenue
increases and the company continues to grow. There are a few obvious downfalls
to working with government contracts; a higher quality is to be expected as well
as extensive research accompanied by accurate and complete documentation are
usually required. If one part of the process fails to perform correctly it can
cause minor flaws as well a problems that can carry some serious repercussions;
For example the case of the failed ...
Want to read the rest of this paper? Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers
|
the
corporate responsibility as a whole in order to find a resolution for cases such
as this.
The first mitigating factor involved in the Company X case is the
uncertainty, on the part of the employees, on their duties that they were
assigned. It is possible that during the testing procedure, an employee
couldn't distinguish between the parts they were to test under government
standards and commercial standards. In some cases they might have even been
misinformed on the final product that they tested. In fact, ignorance on the
part of the employees would fully excuse them from any moral responsibility for
any damage that may result from their work. Whether it is decided that an
employee is fully excused, or is given some moral responsibility, would have to
be looked at on an individual basis.
The second mitigating factor is one of threats that an employee might
suffer if they do not follow through with their assignment. After the bogus
testing was completed in the Company ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays. Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
not have direct involvement with the
testing departments or with the parts that eventually failed. Even employees,
or sub-contractors that were directly involved with the production were not
aware of the ignorance on the part of the testing department. For example, the
electrical engineer that designed the defective computer chip could have stated
that it was tested and it did indeed meet the required government tests. Also,
for the employees that handled the part after the testing process, they were
dealing with what they believed to be a piece of equipment that met government
standards. If the part was not tested properly, and did eventually fail, isn't
the testing department more ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library. Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports, and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Business And Ethics. (2004, August 28). Retrieved March 26, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Business-And-Ethics/13443
"Business And Ethics." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 28 Aug. 2004. Web. 26 Mar. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Business-And-Ethics/13443>
"Business And Ethics." Essayworld.com. August 28, 2004. Accessed March 26, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Business-And-Ethics/13443.
"Business And Ethics." Essayworld.com. August 28, 2004. Accessed March 26, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Business-And-Ethics/13443.
|