Warning: Use of undefined constant referer - assumed 'referer' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 102

Warning: Use of undefined constant host - assumed 'host' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 105

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 106

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays:102) in /usr/home/essaywo/public_html/essays on line 109
Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability - College Paper

Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability

Descartes says that the proposition "I exist" is certain, because of the theory he uses in the first meditation. If we think we exist, then were thinking period. So even if we think we don't exist, then that proves that were still thinking, therefore we must exist. Russell wants to disagree with Descartes by saying that the "I", as Descartes uses it, stands for the self, but for Russell the self is an object. So Russell is trying to point out that if the self is an object, and objects are always in flux, then there is a possibility that we have a different self for every perception, and if this is true, then the statement "I exist " can not be true, because every time you use the ...

Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers

changing for every new sense of data. If this was true , wouldn't every other object we looked at be new to us? Descartes argument for existing is much more believable, for the simple fact that if we think anything we must exist. I think are minds do have stability. Memory is a proof of the stability of the mind. I think that memory is also proof that there is only one self, because if you have a new self for every new sequence of data it would be impossible to have a memory. If memory is stored in our minds and basically our minds are our selfs, and you had a new self for every new perception or object, then each self would only carry one recollection of data sequence, which would be of that one object, but the next time you saw that object it would be like it was the first time, because the recollection of the object would be contained in a different self that no longer exists. It sounds really confusing, but to me it somehow makes sense . The other thing I was thinking ...

Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.

Already a member? Login

CITE THIS PAGE:

APA
MLA
Chicago
Turabian

Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability. (2008, January 17). Retrieved February 23, 2025, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Decartes-Vs-Russell-Whether-Self-Object/77616

"Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 17 Jan. 2008. Web. 23 Feb. 2025. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Decartes-Vs-Russell-Whether-Self-Object/77616>

"Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability." Essayworld.com. January 17, 2008. Accessed February 23, 2025. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Decartes-Vs-Russell-Whether-Self-Object/77616.

JOIN NOW

Join today and get instant access to this and 50,000+ other essays

PAPER DETAILS

Added: 1/17/2008 03:33:10 PM
Category: English
Type: Premium Paper
Words: 445
Pages: 2

Save |

Report

SHARE THIS PAPER

SAVED ESSAYS

Save and find your favorite essays easier