Mirror Worlds vs. Apple, Inc.
Mirror Worlds versus Apple, Inc.
Willful Infringement
ABSTRACT
This paper will discuss the lawsuit filed by Mirror Worlds LLC against Apple, Inc. for infringement of four patents owned by Mirror Worlds. Mirror Worlds’ patents cover intellectual property; namely that of digital and visual media and the consolidation and sorting thereof. The jury’s verdict in this case awarded Mirror Worlds a substantial amount of money for damages caused by the supposed willful infringement of Apple, Inc. In addition, Apple, Inc.’s arguments, namely involving the claim of willful infringement, evolving into a counterclaim against Mirror Worlds will also be discussed.
Keywords: intellectual ...
Want to read the rest of this paper?
Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay
and over 50,000 other term papers
|
regards an “animated graphical user interface for a display screen or portion thereof. The process or period in which an image transitions to another forms no part of the claimed design.” (U.S. Patent D609715 description). Users of the upgraded iTunes, iPhone iPod Touch and iPad products will recognize this patented design when sorting through digital pictures of album covers in either system. However, a separate company by the name of Mirror Worlds, LLC filed an infringement lawsuit against Apple Inc. in March 2008 regarding three of Mirror Worlds’ own patents covering intellectual property; one of which regards the same technology as Apple’s Cover Flow. On October 1, 2010 Mirror Worlds was awarded $208.5 million in damages for each of the three patent infringements by a federal jury in Tyler, Texas. Apple Inc. filed a counterclaim on October 3, “an emergency motion to stay entry of jury verdict and judgment by Apple Inc.” (Civil Action No. 6:08 CV 88, 2010). Apple Inc. ...
Get instant access to over 50,000 essays.
Write better papers. Get better grades.
Already a member? Login
|
the user. “The documents can include text, pictures, animations, software programs, or any other type of data.” (LexisNexis Civil Action No. 6:08 CV 88, 2010).
These patents held by Mirror Worlds also concern hard drive searching software, software supporting automatic backup on a hard drive and the aforementioned software regarding streaming documents and the manner in which they are viewed. The method of the streaming software include “creating a file comprising a collection of documents, displaying a graphical representation of the pile, and browsing the pile by pointing a cursor at a particular item to reveal an indicia for the particular item,” in reference to the “transparency” ...
Succeed in your coursework without stepping into a library.
Get access to a growing library of notes, book reports,
and research papers in 2 minutes or less.
|
CITE THIS PAGE:
Mirror Worlds vs. Apple, Inc.. (2011, April 25). Retrieved December 23, 2024, from http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Mirror-Worlds-vs-Apple-Inc/98392
"Mirror Worlds vs. Apple, Inc.." Essayworld.com. Essayworld.com, 25 Apr. 2011. Web. 23 Dec. 2024. <http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Mirror-Worlds-vs-Apple-Inc/98392>
"Mirror Worlds vs. Apple, Inc.." Essayworld.com. April 25, 2011. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Mirror-Worlds-vs-Apple-Inc/98392.
"Mirror Worlds vs. Apple, Inc.." Essayworld.com. April 25, 2011. Accessed December 23, 2024. http://www.essayworld.com/essays/Mirror-Worlds-vs-Apple-Inc/98392.
|
Save
Report